A video of the corpus can disappear when its author deletes it or makes it private, or when the platform removes it or closes the channel. YOUPOL keeps its metadata and, if it had been transcribed, its transcript.
The removals
What the removed videoscontained.
The last 120 days, for the chosen country. The records are written by our local model from the transcripts made before the removal; the synthesis reads them back.
Country
121
videos became unavailable in 120 days
117
transcribed before their removal
24
records written on their content
0
channels closed since tracking began
The synthesis proposed by our local model
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
The synthesis appears once at least three removed videos have a record.
The reasons
Whythey disappeared.
The reason is known only when the platform states it. The elements on the right are those the records noted in the content, against the usual platform rules; they do not prove the cause of the removal.
Reason given by the platform
01Unavailable, no reason given98
81% of removals · 97 transcribed
02Made private20
17% of removals · 17 transcribed
03Deleted by its author3
2% of removals · 3 transcribed
Elements noted in the records
01Hateful or discriminatory speech9
noted in 9 records
02Other5
noted in 5 records
03Harassment or attack on a person2
noted in 2 records
04Sexual content1
noted in 1 record
05Illegal activities1
noted in 1 record
06Medical or electoral misinformation1
noted in 1 record
07Violence or call to violence1
noted in 1 record
A removal can have many reasons besides content. A deletion by the author or a switch to private does not indicate a breach. The connections the records make remain hypotheses.
One by one
The latestremoved videos.
From the most recent observation to the oldest. “Last seen online” is the last successful audience measurement. The interval to the observation brackets the removal date. Open a video to read its record.
The video creator argues that the commitment of radical left figures is explained by their geographical origin in western France and a privileged social background. He claims that these individuals grew up in "white paradises" and are thus unable to understand the "great replacement." According to him, the lack of insecurity during their childhood forged convictions that are impervious to opposing arguments. Finally, he questions how to raise children to prevent them from becoming "promoters of living together."
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:49 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator associates the radical left with "white paradises" and mentions the "great replacement".
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The video creator suggests that insecurity is linked to people he refers to as "you know who".
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content could be seen as violating hate speech policies, which might explain why the video is unavailable. However, a removal by the author or for other technical reasons remains possible.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:49 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer interviews passers-by in Châtelet about the political positioning of ecology. Some participants claim the subject is driven by the left, while one man argues that the return to the land belongs to the far right. The interviewees debate the efficiency of electric cars and criticize the actions of radical movements. Finally, the videographer presents proposals for soil decontamination and localism, which are approved by some passers-by before the videographer reveals they are proposed by Eric Zemmour and Marine Le Pen.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 18:08 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content contains no elements that would explain the removal of the video by the platform. The deletion could be due to the author's decision or other reasons not visible in the transcription.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 18:08 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
A first speaker asserts that the rape and murder of a woman are consequences of 'patriarchy' and a 'rape culture'. A second speaker argues that this analysis is overgeneralized and leads to fatalism. He maintains that the State should prioritize pragmatism and the execution of OQTFs to neutralize foreign predators, claiming that left-wing feminists relativize these crimes out of hatred for Western victims. The video ends with clips of people discussing an armed assault and racial prejudices.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:50 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
A speaker claims that left-wing feminists act out of hatred for Western victims and denounces the importation of populations from archaic cultures.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
A speaker mentions acts of rape, forced penetration, and libertine games.
Sexual content
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content contains highly controversial remarks on immigration and feminism, which could justify a removal, although the switch to private could result from any other decision by the author.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:50 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator claims that YouTube demonetized his secondary channel in December 2022, followed by his main channel in late January 2023. He argues that the platform justifies this decision by citing content deemed "mass-produced" or "automatically generated," despite his appeals. The author explains that this situation reduces his algorithmic visibility and threatens the financial sustainability of his work. Consequently, he announces the testing of short-form content on TikTok and the posting of reruns on YouTube.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:51 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The removal of the video could be linked to the creator's criticisms of YouTube's moderation and monetization policies. However, a platform removal can result from various reasons not mentioned in the transcript.`,
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:51 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator hosts a bodybuilding athlete nicknamed 'the mountain'. The guest claims to have been a victim of violence and mistreatment by the French police at the age of 13 during police custody for a phone theft he denies committing. He argues that this trauma led him to practice boxing and then bodybuilding to gain confidence and strength. The guest then details his diet, training methods, and admits to using doping products to reach his current weight.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:38 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The guest admits using doping products and mentions obtaining medical supplements for free through a hospital contact.
Illegal activities
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content mentions the use of doping products and serious accusations against the police, which could violate platform rules. However, the video's unavailability could be due to the author's decision or other technical reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:38 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator claims that Quebec and the West are undergoing a 'great replacement' orchestrated by a 'globalist' and 'Jewish messianist' program. He argues that mass immigration saturates public services and causes the housing crisis, advocating for a moratorium and 'remigration'. He criticizes Quebec and Canadian political parties, deeming them ineffective or complicit. Finally, he questions the reality of the Shoah and rehabilitates the German National Socialist regime by contesting official historical versions.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:23 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator attributes the 'replacement' of white populations to a 'Jewish messianist' and 'globalist' program.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The video creator describes irregular immigrants as 'invaders' and advocates for their forced 'remigration'.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The video creator questions the existence of the genocide and the Shoah, referring to these events as a 'so-called genocide'.
Other
The video creator describes health measures related to the pandemic as a 'pandemic scam'.
Medical or electoral misinformation
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content contains statements questioning established historical facts and theories on population replacement, which could justify a removal. However, deletion by the author could be motivated by personal or strategic reasons independent of the content.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:23 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator announces his intention to produce a video discussing motorcycles from sociological, theoretical, and political perspectives. He claims that this subject is personal and that he has been familiar with this environment since childhood. However, the transcription primarily shows tests of framing, lighting, and posture in front of the camera. The creator expresses hesitations regarding the staging and the management of his filming space.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 12:34 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not seem to justify a removal by the platform. The switch to private could be related to the fact that the video consists of technical trials rather than finalized content.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 12:34 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer first recounts two interactions with men in the street, claiming she was insulted and that one of them threw her phone on the ground. She argues that these events illustrate the daily harassment suffered by women, regardless of the perpetrators' origins. She then asserts that one of her videos was misappropriated by "far-right" accounts to fuel a "racist wave." The videographer concludes that harassment is a universal problem that should not serve as an excuse for division.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:57 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer reports being insulted with the term "sale p****" by a man in the street.
Harassment or attack on a person
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not show any obvious element justifying removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 17:57 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator describes transcapacitism as people without disabilities wanting to acquire one, sometimes at taxpayers' expense, which he calls "ridiculous." He claims that students, notably at the University of Ottawa, fear expressing their disagreement during classes. The guest compares this situation to Jordan Peterson's experience, asserting that the latter was excluded from universities due to his ideas. The video creator concludes by claiming that the "far-left" has become a "cancer" in society and in universities.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 13:58 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator describes the far-left as a "cancer" in society and universities.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content uses strong terms such as "cancer" to describe a political current, which could be linked to a removal for hate speech. However, the video may have been deleted by the author or for other unspecified reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 13:58 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator claims that, according to UN statistics, Christians are the target of 75% of religious persecution cases worldwide. He argues that mainstream media remain silent about these attacks while speaking more about "islamophobia." The guest adds that media react strongly to acts of antisemitism or islamophobia but remain "tight-lipped" regarding attacks on Christians. He suggests the existence of an "agenda for the destruction" of the Catholic Church and the figure of Jesus.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 13:59 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The guest mentions the existence of an "agenda for the destruction" of the Catholic Church and Jesus.
Other
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content mentioning a destruction agenda could be analyzed by the platform as problematic content, although the video may have been removed for other reasons by the author.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 13:59 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The podcaster recounts a personal experience with a woman he describes as "feminist all the way." He claims that feminists in Quebec are physically beautiful, unlike the "blue-haired feministes" in the United States. According to him, his partner's sexual experience and self-confidence were a "turn-off." He argues that he should be the one who "coaches" and acts as the "teacher" in the relationship.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:00 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The podcaster contrasts Quebec feminists with American "blue-haired feministes" based on physical criteria.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content addresses gender relations and stereotypes about feminism, which could be linked to a report for discriminatory speech. However, the video may have been removed for other unspecified reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:00 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer explains the concept of the MKUltra project by relying on an example from the television series Evil. He claims that this method allows for memory erasure and the hypnosis of individuals to push them to commit acts such as assassinations. According to him, the KGB and the CIA used these technologies to control "sleeper cells". He maintains that these facts are documented and include experiments with LSD and hypnosis.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:00 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer describes a hypnosis process aimed at pushing a person to kill someone.
Violence or call to violence
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content evoking mind manipulation techniques and assassinations could be linked to the removal, although a removal by the author or a switch to private is also possible.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:00 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator claims that wishing for the imprisonment of a person due to unpleasant remarks is a characteristic of a "communist". He maintains that Canada and the United States are democratic countries where freedom prevails. According to him, requesting prison over a disagreement of opinion is a "crissement bas" act. He suggests that those who are dissatisfied with this system should go to China.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:01 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator uses vulgar language ("décalisse", "crissement bas") to express his dissatisfaction.
Other
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not seem to contain elements justifying a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for reasons unrelated to the content.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:01 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
Two speakers discuss the notion of authenticity in public discourse. The first speaker claims that Donald Trump is popular because he does not practice "political correctness" and does not follow a script, unlike members of the left whom he accuses of being "snakes" and manipulators. The second speaker argues that authenticity involves being able to say "nonsense" without losing the respect of others, citing Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, and Jordan Peterson as examples. The first speaker concludes by criticizing people who point out others' mistakes in the comments.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:02 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The first speaker describes members of the left as "snakes" and accuses them of manipulating.
Harassment or attack on a person
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not show any obvious element justifying removal by the platform; the video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 14:02 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator claims that France recorded more deaths than births in 2025 for the first time since 1945. He argues that the collapse of fertility and the aging of baby boomers lead to a lack of internal population renewal. According to him, demographic growth now relies almost entirely on immigration. The creator presents this situation as a political and economic 'alarm signal', particularly regarding the funding of dependency care.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:26 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator links current demographic growth almost exclusively to immigration.
Other
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content addresses migratory and demographic issues, which could be analyzed by the platform, although deletion by the author or a switch to private mode is also possible.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:26 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator presents demographic data for France as of January 1, 2026. He asserts that deaths exceeded births in 2025, resulting in a negative natural balance. According to him, the migratory balance compensated for this deficit. The creator argues that the birth rate has been declining for four years due to economic reasons, housing, work, or climate concerns. He concludes that France is following a trend common to the majority of European countries.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:27 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not appear to contain elements that would justify removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:27 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
One speaker questions another person about the use of foreign languages and dialects by La France insoumise candidates during the distribution of leaflets. The speaker claims that this practice may constitute a form of 'communitarianism' or 'racism'. The interlocutor responds that she is a teacher of French as a foreign language and argues that France is a 'country of culture'. She distinguishes the concept of an official language from being 'monolingual', citing the example of Canada.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:27 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
A speaker suggests that distributing leaflets in Arabic for Arabic-speaking people is a form of 'racism'.
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content addresses sensitive themes related to identity and communitarianism, which could justify a report. However, the removal could also result from the author's decision or other technical reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:27 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator asks the guest about his experience with censorship. The guest claims that any content opposing 'bien-pensante' (politically correct) thought must be suppressed. He argues that the growth of media outlets such as CNews, Frontières, and La Furia is 'unbearable' for 'the system'. According to him, censorship is employed to prevent these ideas from gaining too much momentum.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:31 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content discusses censorship and the media system, but nothing allows for a direct link to the video's removal. The deletion could be due to other reasons, such as the author's own action or the video being set to private.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:31 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer asks a passerby about the increase in censorship and an "information control plan" in the country. The passerby claims that it is difficult to express oneself as a citizen. She argues that accounts on the social network X are closed for imprecise reasons. She specifies that this censorship targets opinions that do not adhere to "political correctness" without necessarily being aggressive.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:31 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content contains no elements that would explain a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:31 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer claims that Emmanuel Macron is an intelligent man but has not used this quality for France's prosperity. He argues that the president is more interested in Europe than in national industry. When asked by the guest about censorship in France, the videographer answers in the affirmative. He mentions that some people are censored down to their "bank accounts" and refers to a television commentator discussing the economy.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:32 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer claims that people in France are censored down to their "bank accounts".
Other
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content criticizes the executive power and mentions financial censorship, which the platform could analyze as unverified information. However, the video may have been removed for reasons unrelated to its content.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:32 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator presents his book as a "vision" focused on the "defense of our civilization." He claims that this work is based on notions of lineage, heritage, and culture, illustrated by the history of his own ancestors. The author argues that French people have a "legitimate right" to defend their memory and ensure their "historical continuity." Finally, he rejects the idea that French people are a "collection of scoundrels, colonizers, slave traders" and opposes them being "put into a minority in our own land."
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:34 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator mentions the risk of French people being "put into a minority in our own land".
Hateful or discriminatory speech
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content mentioning the fear of ethno-cultural minority status could be analyzed by the platform as discriminatory speech. However, the video may have been removed for other unspecified reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:34 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video creator describes a mechanism he calls "ideological judicialization." He claims that militant associations file complaints based on ideological readings rather than clear criminal offenses. According to him, experts and think tanks then label the targets to disqualify them. Finally, he argues that left-wing media relay these elements, transforming the political actor into a problem to be solved using labels such as "far-right" or "hateful."
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:36 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content criticizes the media and certain associations, but nothing allows for a direct link to be established with the video's removal. The deletion could be due to the author's decision or other technical reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:36 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The video shows a scene of altercation during a political meeting in Avignon. One speaker orders other people to go home. A second speaker exclaims about the duration of the situation. A third speaker suggests leaving the scene. The transcription is unreliable and does not allow for the precise identification of the participants' claims.
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:36 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content contains no explicit elements that would explain a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:36 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The videographer questions a parliamentary assistant on his right to physically block journalists from passing. The assistant asserts that the journalists will not enter. The videographer points out that the speaker is standing in front of police officers. The transcription is partially unreliable, particularly regarding the use of the word "poutine".
Summary generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:37 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video:
The reading of the removal proposed by our local model
The content does not seem to contain elements that would justify removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
Interpretation generated by our modelon 4 October 2026 at 22:37 from the transcript made before the removal of the following video: