A video of the corpus can disappear when its author deletes it or makes it private, or when the platform removes it or closes the channel. YOUPOL keeps its metadata and, if it had been transcribed, its transcript.
The last 120 days, for the chosen country. The records are written by our local model from the transcripts made before the removal; the synthesis reads them back.
The synthesis of the removals covers all the countries. Read it
The reason is known only when the platform states it. The elements on the right are those the records noted in the content, against the usual platform rules; they do not prove the cause of the removal.
A removal can have many reasons besides content. A deletion by the author or a switch to private does not indicate a breach. The connections the records make remain hypotheses.
From the most recent observation to the oldest. “Last seen online” is the last successful audience measurement. The interval to the observation brackets the removal date. Open a video to read its record.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: GEOGAUCHISTE
The video creator argues that the commitment of radical left figures is explained by their geographical origin in western France and a privileged social background. He claims that these individuals grew up in "white paradises" and are thus unable to understand the "great replacement." According to him, the lack of insecurity during their childhood forged convictions that are impervious to opposing arguments. Finally, he questions how to raise children to prevent them from becoming "promoters of living together."
The video creator associates the radical left with "white paradises" and mentions the "great replacement".
Hateful or discriminatory speechThe video creator suggests that insecurity is linked to people he refers to as "you know who".
Hateful or discriminatory speechThe content could be seen as violating hate speech policies, which might explain why the video is unavailable. However, a removal by the author or for other technical reasons remains possible.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: Pourquoi il ne faut SURTOUT pas laisser l’écologie à la GAUCHE (Micro-trottoir)
The videographer interviews passers-by in Châtelet about the political positioning of ecology. Some participants claim the subject is driven by the left, while one man argues that the return to the land belongs to the far right. The interviewees debate the efficiency of electric cars and criticize the actions of radical movements. Finally, the videographer presents proposals for soil decontamination and localism, which are approved by some passers-by before the videographer reveals they are proposed by Eric Zemmour and Marine Le Pen.
The content contains no elements that would explain the removal of the video by the platform. The deletion could be due to the author's decision or other reasons not visible in the transcription.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: TOUS LES HOMMES ?
A first speaker asserts that the rape and murder of a woman are consequences of 'patriarchy' and a 'rape culture'. A second speaker argues that this analysis is overgeneralized and leads to fatalism. He maintains that the State should prioritize pragmatism and the execution of OQTFs to neutralize foreign predators, claiming that left-wing feminists relativize these crimes out of hatred for Western victims. The video ends with clips of people discussing an armed assault and racial prejudices.
A speaker claims that left-wing feminists act out of hatred for Western victims and denounces the importation of populations from archaic cultures.
Hateful or discriminatory speechA speaker mentions acts of rape, forced penetration, and libertine games.
Sexual contentThe content contains highly controversial remarks on immigration and feminism, which could justify a removal, although the switch to private could result from any other decision by the author.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
No record. The video had not been transcribed before its removal.
Original title: LA FIN DE MA CHAÎNE YOUTUBE
The video creator claims that YouTube demonetized his secondary channel in December 2022, followed by his main channel in late January 2023. He argues that the platform justifies this decision by citing content deemed "mass-produced" or "automatically generated," despite his appeals. The author explains that this situation reduces his algorithmic visibility and threatens the financial sustainability of his work. Consequently, he announces the testing of short-form content on TikTok and the posting of reruns on YouTube.
The removal of the video could be linked to the creator's criticisms of YouTube's moderation and monetization policies. However, a platform removal can result from various reasons not mentioned in the transcript.`,
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: LA MONTAGNE : DE 60KG A 140KG
The video creator hosts a bodybuilding athlete nicknamed 'the mountain'. The guest claims to have been a victim of violence and mistreatment by the French police at the age of 13 during police custody for a phone theft he denies committing. He argues that this trauma led him to practice boxing and then bodybuilding to gain confidence and strength. The guest then details his diet, training methods, and admits to using doping products to reach his current weight.
The guest admits using doping products and mentions obtaining medical supplements for free through a hospital contact.
Illegal activitiesThe content mentions the use of doping products and serious accusations against the police, which could violate platform rules. However, the video's unavailability could be due to the author's decision or other technical reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
No record. The video had not been transcribed before its removal.
Original title: NE REGARDEZ PAS CETTE VIDÉO ! (BÊTISIER)
The video creator announces his intention to produce a video discussing motorcycles from sociological, theoretical, and political perspectives. He claims that this subject is personal and that he has been familiar with this environment since childhood. However, the transcription primarily shows tests of framing, lighting, and posture in front of the camera. The creator expresses hesitations regarding the staging and the management of his filming space.
The content does not seem to justify a removal by the platform. The switch to private could be related to the fact that the video consists of technical trials rather than finalized content.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: UN DRAME EN 2 ACTES
The videographer first recounts two interactions with men in the street, claiming she was insulted and that one of them threw her phone on the ground. She argues that these events illustrate the daily harassment suffered by women, regardless of the perpetrators' origins. She then asserts that one of her videos was misappropriated by "far-right" accounts to fuel a "racist wave." The videographer concludes that harassment is a universal problem that should not serve as an excuse for division.
The videographer reports being insulted with the term "sale p****" by a man in the street.
Harassment or attack on a personThe content does not show any obvious element justifying removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: 📉 Solde naturel négatif pour la première fois depuis 1945 👶 Seulement 645 000 bébés en 2025, contre 663 000…
The video creator claims that France recorded more deaths than births in 2025 for the first time since 1945. He argues that the collapse of fertility and the aging of baby boomers lead to a lack of internal population renewal. According to him, demographic growth now relies almost entirely on immigration. The creator presents this situation as a political and economic 'alarm signal', particularly regarding the funding of dependency care.
The video creator links current demographic growth almost exclusively to immigration.
OtherThe content addresses migratory and demographic issues, which could be analyzed by the platform, although deletion by the author or a switch to private mode is also possible.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: En France, les décès dépassent les naissances. La natalité recule, les familles se font plus rares. Économie…
The video creator presents demographic data for France as of January 1, 2026. He asserts that deaths exceeded births in 2025, resulting in a negative natural balance. According to him, the migratory balance compensated for this deficit. The creator argues that the birth rate has been declining for four years due to economic reasons, housing, work, or climate concerns. He concludes that France is following a trend common to the majority of European countries.
The content does not appear to contain elements that would justify removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: « Où est le problème à diffuser des tracts en langue étrangère dans un pays de culture ? Avoir une langue…
One speaker questions another person about the use of foreign languages and dialects by La France insoumise candidates during the distribution of leaflets. The speaker claims that this practice may constitute a form of 'communitarianism' or 'racism'. The interlocutor responds that she is a teacher of French as a foreign language and argues that France is a 'country of culture'. She distinguishes the concept of an official language from being 'monolingual', citing the example of Canada.
A speaker suggests that distributing leaflets in Arabic for Arabic-speaking people is a form of 'racism'.
Hateful or discriminatory speechThe content addresses sensitive themes related to identity and communitarianism, which could justify a report. However, the removal could also result from the author's decision or other technical reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: « Tout ce qui va à contre-courant de la pensée bien-pensante doit être supprimée, surtout quand ça prend de…
The video creator asks the guest about his experience with censorship. The guest claims that any content opposing 'bien-pensante' (politically correct) thought must be suppressed. He argues that the growth of media outlets such as CNews, Frontières, and La Furia is 'unbearable' for 'the system'. According to him, censorship is employed to prevent these ideas from gaining too much momentum.
The content discusses censorship and the media system, but nothing allows for a direct link to the video's removal. The deletion could be due to other reasons, such as the author's own action or the video being set to private.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: « Oui, on a du mal à s'exprimer en tant que citoyenne. Sur X, on est souvent, comment dirais-je, censurés…
The videographer asks a passerby about the increase in censorship and an "information control plan" in the country. The passerby claims that it is difficult to express oneself as a citizen. She argues that accounts on the social network X are closed for imprecise reasons. She specifies that this censorship targets opinions that do not adhere to "political correctness" without necessarily being aggressive.
The content contains no elements that would explain a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: « Emmanuel Macron est un homme très intelligent, mais pas pour la prospérité de la France : il s’intéresse…
The videographer claims that Emmanuel Macron is an intelligent man but has not used this quality for France's prosperity. He argues that the president is more interested in Europe than in national industry. When asked by the guest about censorship in France, the videographer answers in the affirmative. He mentions that some people are censored down to their "bank accounts" and refers to a television commentator discussing the economy.
The videographer claims that people in France are censored down to their "bank accounts".
OtherThe content criticizes the executive power and mentions financial censorship, which the platform could analyze as unverified information. However, the video may have been removed for reasons unrelated to its content.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: « Ce livre est une vision, celle de la défense de notre civilisation. Je rappelle dans cet ouvrage notre…
The video creator presents his book as a "vision" focused on the "defense of our civilization." He claims that this work is based on notions of lineage, heritage, and culture, illustrated by the history of his own ancestors. The author argues that French people have a "legitimate right" to defend their memory and ensure their "historical continuity." Finally, he rejects the idea that French people are a "collection of scoundrels, colonizers, slave traders" and opposes them being "put into a minority in our own land."
The video creator mentions the risk of French people being "put into a minority in our own land".
Hateful or discriminatory speechThe content mentioning the fear of ethno-cultural minority status could be analyzed by the platform as discriminatory speech. However, the video may have been removed for other unspecified reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: « On transforme une critique politique en menace pour la République. Plaintes militantes, rapports…
The video creator describes a mechanism he calls "ideological judicialization." He claims that militant associations file complaints based on ideological readings rather than clear criminal offenses. According to him, experts and think tanks then label the targets to disqualify them. Finally, he argues that left-wing media relay these elements, transforming the political actor into a problem to be solved using labels such as "far-right" or "hateful."
The content criticizes the media and certain associations, but nothing allows for a direct link to be established with the video's removal. The deletion could be due to the author's decision or other technical reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: 🚨 Venus couvrir le meeting de LFI à Avignon, nos journalistes ont été pris à partie par des militants LFI et…
The video shows a scene of altercation during a political meeting in Avignon. One speaker orders other people to go home. A second speaker exclaims about the duration of the situation. A third speaker suggests leaving the scene. The transcription is unreliable and does not allow for the precise identification of the participants' claims.
The content contains no explicit elements that would explain a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: 🚨 Le collaborateur parlementaire de Raphaël Arnault tente, tout penaud, d’aller voir les forces de l’ordre…
The videographer questions a parliamentary assistant on his right to physically block journalists from passing. The assistant asserts that the journalists will not enter. The videographer points out that the speaker is standing in front of police officers. The transcription is partially unreliable, particularly regarding the use of the word "poutine".
The content does not seem to contain elements that would justify removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted or set to private by the author for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: « Il y a une trentaine d’années, le RPR de Jacques Chirac était la principale force populaire à droite, avec…
The video creator analyzes the evolution of right-wing political forces in France. He claims that the National Rally has replaced the RPR as the main popular force, relegating Les Républicains to the role of a "satellite party." According to him, the electorate in peri-urban and peripheral areas, which he calls "the quiet France," is shifting from Les Républicains to the National Rally. He argues that this phenomenon is the result of a progressive erosion and is particularly evident during municipal elections.
The content does not seem to contain elements justifying a removal by the platform. The video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
Original title: "Mélenchon a traité nos journalistes de rats crevés, de chiens. Le tout : en leur mettant une cible dans le…
The videographer explains that his media outlet conducts investigations into the far-left and the LFI party. He claims that Jean-Luc Mélenchon described the journalists of his media as "dead rats" and "dogs." According to him, these remarks amount to putting "targets on the backs" of the journalists. The videographer then requests financial support from his audience to continue his investigative activities and university debates.
The videographer attributes insults and threats from Jean-Luc Mélenchon toward journalists.
Harassment or attack on a personThe content mentions insults and threats, which could be linked to the removal by the platform. However, the video may have been deleted by the author or set to private for other reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Original title: « Ils sont en liberté. Mais que voulez-vous : il y aussi des rats crevés, des chiens enragés, quand on peut…
The videographer claims that Jean-Luc Mélenchon hates him and calls him "dead rats" or "rabid dogs". A second speaker describes Frontière members as "despicable people" and suggests they might eventually be banned. This speaker compares these individuals to "dead rats" or "rabid dogs" who should be captured or ignored. Finally, the videographer asserts that his media outlet is the only one investigating La France Insoumise and requests subscriptions to continue this work.
A speaker describes Frontière journalists as "despicable people", "dead rats", and "rabid dogs".
Hateful or discriminatory speechA speaker mentions "self-defense" in the event that the journalists were to hit him.
Violence or call to violenceThe use of dehumanizing terms and the mention of violence could justify a removal for violating platform rules. However, the video may have been deleted by the author or for other unspecified reasons.
A hypothesis, not the established cause of the removal.
Content in preparation. It will appear here as soon as it is ready.
Transcribed before its removal.
All causes together, since collection began.
